These are some thoughts that I have had on philosophy, society, politics, and
government policy. These thoughts are not necessarily fully formed. I
welcome discussion and I am eager to hear your thoughts on any of these
or other issues.
Freedom vs Security
Freedom, by its simplest definition, is a lack of constraints. True
freedom is anarchy. Laws create order by constraining freedom.
Enforced order brings security. Question anybody who claims to be
making a law to protect freedom.
Freedom and security are traded for one another across the spectrum
between anarchy and totalitarianism.
Where the balance lies varies from one government to another. Where
the balance should lie is a matter of opinion.
Iraq is a society that went, almost overnight, from totalitarianism to
anarchy.
Preemptive War
The doctrine of nations not to attack another unless it has gone on
attack first ensures peace. It saved the world from nuclear
annihilation during the Cold War.
The US wars in Korea and Vietnam were entered into during an attack on
at least a semblance of another independent nation. George H. W.
Bush's Gulf War was against Iraq for attacking Kuwait.
The doctrine of no preemption was replaced by the "Bush doctrine"
during the presidency of George W. Bush to justify wars in Afghanistan
and Iraq against nations that had conducted no attacks on other
nations.
The Oklahoma National Guard did not invade Michigan, which had
harbored Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols as they planned their
terrorist attack on the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City. Nor
did the Oklahoma National Guard use its overwhelming force to invade
nearby Wisconsin, a midwestern neighbor unrelated to the Murrah
Building terrorist attack.
The US military invading Afghanistan, which had harbored the
terrorists who attacked New York's World Trade Center sets a dangerous
precedent. The US military invasion of Iraq, a middle eastern
neighbor unrelated to the World Trade Center attack sets an even more
dangerous precedent.
Terrorism
Terrorism has existed throughout human history, as has the use of mind
altering substances. No war on terror can eradicate terrorism any
more than a war on drugs can eradicate drug use.
Fighting terrorism and stopping attacks before they happen, whether
domestically or internationally requires policing. The application of
military force has limited effect on preventing terrorism while
fomenting hateful feelings that might motivate future attacks.
| Afghanistan |
Vietnam |
role |
| Afghanistan |
Vietnam |
location |
| The Soviet Union |
France |
previously defeated invader |
| the war on terror |
the cold war |
worldwide struggle justifying war |
| Taliban |
Viet Cong |
the enemy, defending their homeland and culture, with no other place to go |
| Osama Bin Laden |
Ho Chi Minh |
revered enemy leader |
| Barak Obama |
Lyndon Johnson |
US president who staked his reputation on continuing the war |
| Stanley McChrystal |
William Westmoreland |
general prosecuting the war who repeatedly requests more troops |
| Hamid Karzai |
Ngo Dinh Diem |
corrupt president of puppet government who leaves US soldiers to do the fighting |
| Afghan Army |
ARVN |
ineffective corrupt army, trained by US advisors, infiltrated by spies, and incapable of surprise operations |
| CIA drones |
B-52 bomber |
invisible airplane providing total US air superiority |
| mountain roads |
tunnels |
route for the enemy to move unseen |
| Pakistan |
Cambodia |
neighboring country providing enemy support, in which the US carries out covert operations |
| Afghanis |
Vietnamese |
defenseless people aiding whichever force is in their village |
| terrorist |
communist |
US government description of dangerous enemy philosophy |
| Islam |
Buddhism |
enemies' foreign religion |
| 2010 major attack? |
1968 Tet Offensive |
enemies' 9th year massive nation-wide surprise attack, turning US popular opinion against the war |
| 2017 ? |
1975 |
completion of US withdrawal |
Continuity during Leadership Changes
It is important for the internal coherence and external credibility of
an organization that its policies change only gradually after a change
in leadership.
Decades of carefully negotiated treaties including the US/Russian
Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, Kyoto Protocol, International Criminal
Court, and doctrine of no premptive war were all scrapped during
the first year of the George W. Bush administration. Deeper national
political divisions and international distrust of the US ensued.
Budget Deficits
A responsible government treats its tax paying beneficiaries fairly by
operating with a balanced budget.
Operating at a deficit should only be tolerated in situations of
unanticipated crises and should be compensated for by operating with a
budget surplus during times of stability. To the extent that ongoing
long-term efforts such as a cold war, a war on terrorism, or a war on
drugs are necessary, they should be budgeted and do not justify
deficit operation.
Population & The Environment
There are certain natural resources in the world that contribute to
our quality of life and are being consumed faster than they are
replenished. As the world population increases, the problem of the
diminishing supply of such resources worsens.
Some totalitarian environmentalists would have us each reduce our personal
consumption, at the expense of our quality of life, in order to
reduce the rate of total consumption. With an ever growing population, we would need an
ever shrinking amount of personal consumption in order to achieve
sustainability.
For any particular resource, there is a world population limit at
which that resource can be sustainibly consumed in such a way that
everybody's desire for personal consumption is satisfied without
compromise. Today we exceed that population level for many
resources.
Our leaders and governments, if truly concerned with our long-term
best interests, will take actions to reduce the world population
(needless to say, gradually and humanely). Unfortunately, since
this opposes the teachings of major world religions, governments
are taking no such action. As a result, people of the future will
suffer a reduced quality of life manifest through war, hunger, and
disease.
Marriage
Government need not recognize marriages recognized by religions.
Religions need not recognize marriages recognized by governments.
A government that appropriately recognizes the separation of
church and state will neither legalize nor ban gay marriage.
Such a government will neither legalize nor ban polygamy.
Government should hold both biological parents of a child responsible
for the child's reasonable upbringing.
Collective Bargaining (Unions)
US trade unions were important for ensuring workers' rights for fair pay and working
conditions in the early 1900s. With the advent of the national minimum wage and OSHA the
government now provides such protections. Unions today often strong-arm struggling
employers for benefits that are detrimental to the long term business health of the
employer.
Workers in today's non-union auto manufacturing businesses are not substantially worse-off
than union workers in comparable jobs. However, the employers of union workers are at a
competitive disadvantage that threatens their survival in the marketplace. Survival on
which union workers are counting for their pensions in retirement.
Most trade unions in the US have outlived their usefulness.
Debt & Slavery
Throughout history people have made arrangements to receive a
benefit in the short-term based on their credit with somebody else
and work off their debt over time. That is indentured servitude.
Historically, in many societies, children were expected to
repay the debts of their parents if the parents were unable to do
so. Also, in many societies, debts can be traded as assets between
creditors. If a debt is so great that it can not be paid with an
entire lifetime of work, then it is possible in such societies for
a child to be born into indentured servitude, remain there for the
rest of his or her life, and have his or her work obligation bought
and sold any number of times.
In America today children are not required to pay their parents'
debts. If somebody dies with debt it is tough luck for the
creditor. This freedom has allowed many Americans to take on a
lifetime of debt early in their lives, ensuring that they will
spend the rest of their lives working in the indentured servitude
of their creditors.
Productivity & Power
Even basic subsistence requires the consumption of resources of
general value. Some consume more resources of general value than
they produce and others produce more than they consume. Those that
produce more than they consume have an advantage. This is true at
an individual and a societal level.
Dependence on somebody else to satisfy one's needs is a position of
weakness. The ability to satisfy the needs of another is a position
of power. The strongest relationship are those in which partners
simultaneously complement each other's strengths and weaknesses
with a net balance between the disparities. The number of partners
need not necessarily be 2.
If maximum power is the goal such as would be the case in building
a superpower nation then a simple maximization of productivity and
minimization of consumption is the goal. In such a case it is
necessary to adjust cultural ideals to value hard work and devalue
having extraneous material possessions.
Food Value
Several decades from now the upcoming superpower nations, China
and India, will face trade deficits in food and a reliance on food
imports. India because of its unchecked population growth and China
because of its large population combined with its historically poor
stewardship of its arable land. This will give food production an
increased value.
Nations with large areas of land and relatively thin populations
such as Brazil, Russia, and The United States will see a trade
benefit and a corresponding increase in national power. Worldwide,
farmers will be financially rewarded and held in increasingly high
esteem.
Music
A talented musician today, with less than $1000 of digital recording
equipment, can create recordings at the same level of quality as
professional recordings of famous artists. Through peer-to-peer file
sharing networks it is possible to distribute a recording to millions
of listeners for free. With today's technology, listeners should be
able to enjoy good music at a cost of about 1 cent per recording and
talented musicians should be able to earn a comfortable living making
such music.
Today's famous musical "artists" are no more talented than thousands
of other unfamous artists. Today's famous musical "artists" rarely
write the songs that they perform. So many multi-track digital-effect
recording techniques are used that today's famous musical "artists"
often can not actually perform their songs in live concerts but must
lip sync instead.
Today's famous musical "artists" are famous because they have been
promoted. These "artists" were chosen for promotion by corporations
in the recording industry usually because they look attractive in
videos. Attractive "artists" sell more albums, the revenue from which
predominantly goes into more promotion. The Grammy awards were
originally invented by Alexander Graham Bell to honor the
artist who helped his corporation sell the most Gramophones.
Sharing Music
Downloading music is legal. Downloading a recording is always
legal regardless of the copyrights on that recording. Copyright laws
limit the copying of art. The person who shares music is making the
copy, not the person downloading the music.
By my interpretation of copyright law, if you find a work of art in
the public domain that has no clear copyright notice and you are
reasonably unaware that the art was released into the public domain
illegally then it is legal to make and give away copies of that art.
That means that it is legal to share music files as long as those
files have no clear copyright notice and you have not been informed
that the file was previously copied illegally.
It is illegal to remove a copyright notice and give away a copyright
work of art without that notice. That means that it is illegal to
remove a copyright notice from the file name of a copyright music
file and proceed to give that file away. It is also illegal to remove
a copy notice from the id3 tag of an mp3 file and give the file away.
It would also be illegal to edit a recording to remove a clearly
spoken message indicating that it is copyright and then give the
recording away.
It is illegal to make copies of copyright art without permission.
That means that if a music file has a clear indication that it is
copyright, such as a copyright notice in its file name or a clearly
spoken message as part of the recording, then it is illegal to
share that file. Furthermore, to make a music file by ripping a CD
sold with a clearly written copyright notice and then to give away
copies of that file is illegal.
A copyright owner may file a lawsuit and seek an injunction and
damages against whoever infringed their rights by copying and
distributing the recording without proper copyright notice, but that
is neither a problem nor should it be a concern for listeners who
download music or share music that has no copyright notice.
There is an international concert of the world's smallest violins
being played just for the Recording Industry Association of Ameria
(RIAA) and its member corporations.